Is anarchy1 a realistic social organization? Based on its absence in the modern world one would be tempted to answer in the negative, at least for communities above the size of indigenous tribe (a few thousands, say.) Showing that complex and large-scale societies can function (or, even better, that they have already functioned) without a strong state and its inherent dangers would be a powerful argument in favor of attempting such a decentralized system in our time. This is exactly the argument that David Graeber and David Wengrow are trying to make in The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity. Unfortunately, they are trying too hard. Below the fold, I'll give a synopsis of the first part of the book (chapters 1 to 6). A second post will summarize chapters 7-12 and a third one will conclude the review.